4.7 Article

Influence of breast cancer prognostic factors on oocyte in vitro maturation outcomes performed for urgent fertility preservation

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 1480-1488

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac109

Keywords

IVM; breast cancer; prognostic factors; fertility preservation; oocyte vitrification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the influence of breast cancer (BC) characteristics on in vitro maturation (IVM) outcomes of oocytes in patients undergoing fertility preservation (FP). The study found that Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) III grade, triple-negative BC, and HER2 overexpression are independent predictors of fewer oocytes or poor IVM outcomes in young women seeking FP.
STUDY QUESTION Do breast cancer (BC) characteristics influence IVM of oocytes outcomes in patients undergoing fertility preservation (FP)? SUMMARY ANSWER Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) III grade, triple-negative BC and HER2 overexpression are independent predictors of fewer oocytes or poor IVM outcomes in young women seeking FP. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY SBR grade, triple-negative status and overexpression of HER2, as well as a high Ki67 proliferation index are all established prognostic factors for BC, influencing patients' therapeutic management. Yet there are also concerns about the potential impact of cancer status on ovarian reserve and function. Previous studies analysing the results of ovarian stimulation in BC patients have shown conflicting findings. Nevertheless, there is no data on the potential impact of BC status and prognostic factors on IVM outcome in women undergoing urgent FP. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We studied 321 BC patients, 18 to 41 years of age, who were also candidates for oocyte cryopreservation following IVM. The number of oocytes recovered, maturation rate and total number of cryopreserved oocytes were assessed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Ovarian reserve markers (antral follicle count [AFC] and serum anti-Mullerian hormone [AMH] levels) and IVM outcomes were compared according to BC characteristics (Ki67 proliferation index >20%, progesterone and/or oestrogen receptors expression, HER2 status and SBR grade). Logistic regression analysis was then performed to determine the variables that could be independently associated with poor IVM outcomes, such as oocyte retrieval rate <50%, oocyte maturation rate MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Overall, the mean age of the population was 32.3 +/- 4.1 years. Mean AFC and serum AMH levels were 22.8 +/- 13.9 follicles and 3.8 +/- 3.1 ng/ml, respectively. AMH levels were significantly lower in case of triple-negative BC when compared with ER/PR/HER2 status positive cancer (3.1 +/- 2.6 ng/ml vs 4.0 +/- 3.3 ng/ml, P = 0.02). The mean number of recovered oocytes was 10.2 +/- 9.1. After a mean maturation rate of 58.0 +/- 26.1%, 5.8 +/- 5.3 mature oocytes were cryopreserved per cycle. The number of retrieved and cryopreserved oocytes after IVM were significantly lower in patients presenting with an SBR III tumour when compared with an SBR I or II tumour (9.6 +/- 8.7 vs 11.7 +/- 9.8, P = 0.02 and 5.4 +/- 5.4 vs 6.6 +/- 5.8, P = 0.02, respectively). Multivariate statistical analysis showed that HER2 positive status was associated with a mean maturation rate <60% (odds ratio: 0.54; 95% CI (0.30-0.97)). Ki67 and hormonal status were not correlated with poor IVM outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION A weakness is the retrospective nature of the study. Moreover, as with many studies focusing on FP in oncology patients, the lack of data after reutilization of IVM oocytes prevents drawing reliable conclusions on the fate of these frozen gametes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS BC prognostic factors might influence IVM outcomes. Moreover, HER2 is likely to be involved in the ovarian function and oocyte maturation process. Further investigations are needed to better understand the mechanisms at play and their possible impact on the competence of IVM oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No specific funding was used and there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available