4.5 Review

Review of reference values for the assessment of inhalation risks for workers at industrial contaminated sites

Journal

HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Volume 28, Issue 5-6, Pages 664-682

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2022.2071206

Keywords

Contaminated sites; risk assessment; workers exposure; inhalation reference values

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the procedures used to assess the inhalation risks of workers exposed to chemicals emitted from contaminated environmental matrices or present in the productive cycle. The study finds that the limit values for environmental exposure are more conservative than those for occupational exposure, which can be attributed to the toxicological parameters used in the calculations.
This study examines the procedures used to assess the inhalation risks of workers exposed to chemicals emitted from contaminated environmental matrices (environmental exposure) or to substances present in the productive cycle (occupational exposure). For the environmental exposure, the limit values for workers set by U.S. EPA (RBSLair) were considered. For the occupational exposure, the values set by EU directives (OELVs) and in the REACH regulation (DN(M)ELs) were examined. Despite a similar derivation methodology, the assessment and uncertainty factors employed to derive the RBSLair are more conservative than the corresponding factors adopted to calculate OELVs and DN(M)ELs. These differences can be ascribed to the toxicological parameters adopted for calculating RBSLair for workers that, although with different exposure factors, are the same used to calculate the limit values for sensitive receptors (e.g., children and the elderly). The comparison carried out on 110 substances typically of concern in contaminated sites showed that RBSLair for workers are noticeably more conservative than the corresponding OELV and DN(M)EL. RSBLair are more than two orders of magnitude lower than OELV and DN(M)EL for 50% of the examined substances and over three orders of magnitude in 25% of cases. In the future, a harmonization is desirable as, currently, the risk assessment for the same receptor and the same substance can lead to completely different outcomes depending on whether environmental or occupational exposure is considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available