4.8 Review

Beyond circadian rhythms: emerging roles of ultradian rhythms in control of liver functions

Journal

HEPATOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages 1022-1035

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1002/hep.32580

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the basic principles of circadian rhythms and the recent research progress in hepatic ultradian rhythms. It discusses the prevalence and mechanisms of hepatic 12-hour rhythms and 8-hour rhythms, as well as other frequencies of ultradian rhythms. The limitations of current approaches and the challenges in identifying and understanding the molecular basis of ultradian rhythms are also examined.
The mammalian liver must cope with various metabolic and physiological changes that normally recur every day and primarily stem from daily cycles of rest-activity and fasting-feeding. Although a large body of evidence supports the reciprocal regulation of circadian rhythms and liver function, the research on the hepatic ultradian rhythms have largely been lagging behind. However, with the advent of more cost-effective high-throughput omics technologies, high-resolution time-lapse imaging, and more robust and powerful mathematical tools, several recent studies have shed new light on the presence and functions of hepatic ultradian rhythms. In this review, we will first very briefly discuss the basic principles of circadian rhythms, and then cover in greater details the recent literature related to ultradian rhythms. Specifically, we will highlight the prevalence and mechanisms of hepatic 12-h rhythms, and 8-h rhythms, which cycle at the second and third harmonics of circadian frequency. Finally, we also refer to ultradian rhythms with other frequencies and examine the limitations of the current approaches as well as the challenges related to identifying ultradian rhythm and addressing their molecular underpinnings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available