4.4 Article

Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with atrioventricular conduction disease: A prospective multicenter study

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 1484-1490

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.033

Keywords

Atrioventricular block; Conduction system pacing; His-bundle pacing; Left bundle branch area pacing; Physiological pacing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and electrophysiological characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with atrioventricular (AV) conduction disease. The results showed that LBBAP is safe and feasible with high success rates for patients with AV conduction disease.
BACKGROUND The reported success rate of His-bundle pacing (HBP) in patients with infranodal atrioventricular (AV) conduction disease is only 52%-76%. The success rate of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in this cohort is not well studied. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and electrophysiological characteristics of LBBAP in patients with AV conduction disease. METHODS Patients with AV conduction disease referred for pacemaker implantation at 2 centers between February 2019 and June 2021 were considered for LBBAP. Baseline demographic characteristics, procedural success rates, electrophysiological parameters, and complications were assessed. RESULTS LBBAP was successful in 340 of 364 patients (93%). Mean age was 72 +/- 13 years, and mean follow-up was 331 +/- 244 days. Pacing indications were Mobitz I in 27 patients (7%), Mobitz II or 2:1 AV block or high-grade AV block in 94 patients (26%), complete heart block in 199 patients (55%), and sick sinus syndrome with isolated bundle branch block in 44 patients (12%). Left bundle branch block and right bundle branch block were present in 57 patients (16%) and 140 patients (38%), respectively. Procedural success rates did not differ between indications (92.6%, 93.6%, 92.9%, and 95%, respectively) or between patients with narrow (<120 ms) vs wide QRS (>= 120 ms). Mean LBBAP threshold was 0.77 +/- 0.34 V at 0.4 ms at implant and remained stable during follow-up. There were 4 (1.2%) acute LBBAP lead dislodgments. CONCLUSION LBBAP is safe and feasible with high success rates for patients with AV conduction disease. In contrast to HBP, LBBAP success rates remain high over the entire spectrum of AV conduction disease, and lead parameters remain stable during follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available