4.4 Article

Heart Rhythm Society Atrial Fibrillation Centers of Excellence Study: A survey analysis of stakeholder practices, needs, and barriers

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1039-1048

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.02.022

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Centers of excellence; Stakeholder surveys; Access; Education; Stroke prevention; Needs; Barriers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to understand the current practices, needs, and potential barriers to implementing optimal care for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The surveys found that standardized protocols and care pathways were not commonly used in emergency departments or inpatient settings. All stakeholders agreed that stroke prevention was a top priority, but bleeding risk was the most frequent barrier to initiating treatment. Patients emphasized the importance of education on modifiable causes and reducing stroke risk. Less than half of the healthcare systems tracked AF patients or treatment status. The most common barriers to implementing AF centers of excellence were administrative support and cost.
BACKGROUND An integrated, coordinated, and patient-centered approach to atrial fibrillation (AF) care delivery may improve outcomes and reduce cost. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding from key stakeholder groups on current practices, needs, and potential barriers to implementing optimal integrated AF care. METHODS A series of comprehensive questionnaires were designed by the Heart Rhythm Society Atrial Fibrillation Centers of Excellence (CoE) Task Force to conduct surveys with physicians, advanced practice professionals, patients, and hospital administrators. Data collected focused on the following areas: access to care, stroke prevention, education, AF quality improvement, and AF CoE needs and barriers. Survey responses were collated and analyzed by the Task Force. RESULTS The surveys identified 5 major unmet needs: (1) Standardized protocols, order sets, or care pathways in the emergency department or inpatient setting were uncommon (36%-42%). (2) All stakeholders agreed stroke prevention was a top priority; however, prior bleeding or risk of bleeding was the most frequent barrier for initiation. (3) Patients indicated that education on modifiable causes, AF-related complications, and lowering stroke risk is most important. (4) Less than half (43%) of the health care systems track patients with AF or treatment status. Patients reported that stroke and heart failure prevention and access to procedures were priority areas for an AF CoE. The most common barriers to implementing AF CoE identified by clinicians were administrative support (69%) and cost (52%); administrators reported physical space (43%). CONCLUSION On the basis of the findings of this study, the Task Force identified high priority areas to develop initiatives to aid the implementation of AF CoE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available