4.5 Article

Facial nerve perineural spread from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A single institution analysis of epidemiology, treatment, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hed.27017

Keywords

cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; facial nerve; perineural spread; radiation therapy; skull base surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined patients with perineural spread of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The results showed that most patients had recurrent disease (89.0%) and simultaneous trigeminal nerve involvement (67.1%). Surgery and post-operative radiotherapy were the main treatments, and early-stage disease and clear surgical margins improved outcomes.
Background This study aimed to examine patients with facial nerve (VII) perineural spread (PNS) from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients managed by an Australian tertiary center between 2000 and 2019. Results Seventy three patients were included. Most presented with recurrent disease (89.0%) and simultaneous trigeminal nerve (V) involvement (67.1%). Of the 55 patients (75.3%) who received curative intent treatment, 48 received surgery plus/minus post-operative radiotherapy. In these patients, 5-year disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival was 50.7%, 68.7%, and 58.1%, respectively. Pathological nodal disease, involved margins, increasing VII zonal extent, and concurrent zone 2 V PNS significantly worsened outcomes. Conclusion High rates of recurrent disease reflects the importance of adequate treatment of the primary. Surgery and post-operative radiotherapy remains the mainstay treatment. Outcomes are improved in early-stage disease and with clear surgical margins, reinforcing the need for prompt diagnosis and intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available