Journal
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 10-14Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hast.1350
Keywords
WHO; World Health Organization; genome editing; CRISPR; law; governance; bioethics
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The World Health Organization's report recognizes the complexity and fragility of ethical assessments of human genome editing, and recommends cautious handling of the technology. It explores some oversight mechanisms and discusses the impracticality of certain approaches like international law.
The World Health Organization's recent Report on Human Genome Editing departs from similar reports from other institutions in that it recognizes that ethical assessments of the technology are deeply complex, surprisingly fragile, and subject to practical and political considerations. The WHO report largely recommends that human genome editing, rather than being accepted in some circumstances and banned in others, should be handled with care. The report recommends some oversight mechanisms-such as intellectual property licensing-previously undiscussed or underexplored in sister reports, and it recognizes that others-like international law-may be impractical. This essay explores how the report has shifted global considerations of governing human genome editing to more pragmatic ends.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available