Journal
HARMFUL ALGAE
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2022.102220
Keywords
Harmful algal blooms (HABs); Viability; Neutral Red (NR); Evans Blue (EB); Gymnodinium catenatum; Corethron hystrix
Categories
Funding
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) , U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) [NA04OAR4170146]
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41976134]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
By screening various stains, it was found that Neutral Red (NR) stain is a reliable vital stain for defining the viability of Gymnodinium catenatum (GC) cysts and Corethron hystrix diatoms. Another stain, Evans Blue (EB), can be used as a mortal stain for diatom cells but not as a sensitive indicator of viability for GC cysts.
Expansion of harmful algal bloom (HAB) species through ships' ballast water and sediment has been an increasing concern. Determining whether a microalgal cell, particularly for the toxic and HAB-forming species, is viable or dead is fundamental to understanding the effectiveness of the many ballast-water treatments that have been considered. To this end, we screened a variety of stains to assess the viability of dinoflagellate (Gymnodinium catenatum, GC) cysts and diatom (Corethron hystrix) vegetative cells to test the efficiency of ballast water treatments. Results showed that the stains fluorescing red or green are not sound candidates for viability measurements due to the interference of chlorophyll-induced red fluorescence or cytosolic green auto fluorescence, while the use of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide is limited by its toxicity, pseudo-positive judgment and the consequent confusion between cysts and vegetative cells. We further demonstrated that the stain Neutral Red (NR) is a sound candidate as the vital stain and can be easily applied for functionally defining the viability of both dinoflagellate cysts and diatoms. Another stain, the Evans Blue (EB), could be used as a mortal stain for the vegetative diatom cells but not a sensitive indicator of viability for GC cysts. The NR staining for GC cysts generally needs a higher dosage (0.005%) and longer staining time (24 h) than that were used for staining zooplankton, diatoms, and vegetative cells of dinoflagellates. In all cases, EB staining defined a percentage of viable cells significantly higher than that defined by NR. We conclude that the viability of a population is highly dependent on the species of stains used thus must be referred as a method defined indicator.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available