4.6 Review

Oncologic results of fertility sparing surgery of cervical cancer: An updated systematic review

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 165, Issue 1, Pages 169-183

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.023

Keywords

Early-stage cervical cancer; Conservative treatment; Conisation; Trachelectomy; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Fertility; Prognostic factor; Radical trachelectomy; Recurrence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review aims to evaluate the outcomes of different surgical treatments in preserving fertility in patients with cervical cancer by analyzing oncological issues. The results show that the oncological outcomes are similar among different surgical methods in patients with stage IB1 disease. However, in patients with stage IB2 disease, open surgery has the lowest recurrence rate. Nevertheless, open surgery has the lowest pregnancy rate.
Background. Several techniques can be proposed as fertility sparing surgery in young patients treated for cervical cancer but uncertaincies remain concerning their outcomes. Analysis of oncological issues is then the first aim of this review in order to evaluate the best strategy. Results. Data were identified from searches of MEDLINE, Current Contents, PubMed and from references in relevant articles from January 1987 to 15th of September 2021. We carry out an updated systematic review involving 5862 patients initially selected for fertility-sparing surgery in 275 series. Findings. In patients having a stage IB1 disease, recurrence rate/RR in patients undergoing simple conisation/ trachelectomy, radical trachelectomy/RT by laparoscopico-vaginal approach, laparotomic or laparoscopic approaches are respectively: 4.1%, 4.7%, 2.4% and 5.2%. In patients having a stage IB2 disease, RR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or RT by laparotomy are respectively 13.2% and 4.8% (p = .0035). After neoadjuvant treatment a simple cone/trachelectomy was carried out in 91 (30%) patients and a radical one in 210 (70%) cases. But the lowest pregnancy rate is observed in patients undergoing RT by laparotomy (36%). Conclusions. The choice between these treatments should be based above all, on objective oncological data that strike a balance for each procedure between the best chances for cure and the fertility results. In patients having a stage IB1 disease, oncological results are quite similar according to the procedure used. In patients having a stage IB2 disease, RT by open approach has the lowest RR. Anyway the lowest pregnancy rate is observed in patients undergoing RT by laparotomy. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available