4.4 Article

Objective evaluation of changes in lens clarity after repeated injections of ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05668-9

Keywords

Cataract; Lens densitometry; Ranibizumab; Scheimpflug imaging

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our results objectively demonstrate early nuclear lens density changes using Scheimpflug images in eyes with n-AMD that were treated with repeated ranibizumab injections for 12 months.
Purpose To objectively evaluate changes in lens densitometry in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) treated with repeated intravitreal ranibizumab injections during a 12-month period and to compare the results with those in untreated healthy fellow eyes and healthy control eyes. Methods In this prospective study, the 36 treated eyes and the 37 untreated fellow eyes of 38 patients with n-AMD and the 32 control eyes of 32 healthy individuals were analyzed. Lens densitometry was evaluated using the Scheimpflug imaging. All data in both groups regarding lens densitometry were recorded at baseline and 12 months. Results The mean densitometry of zone 1 in the treated eyes of patients had increased significantly at 12 months compared with the baseline (baseline: 9.3 +/- 1.5, 12 months: 11.9 +/- 1.7, p = .004) and was significantly greater than those measurements in the fellow eyes (9.8 +/- 1.6 p = .02) and control eyes (9.6 +/- 1.9, p = .01) at 12 months as well. There were no significant differences in terms of densitometry values between the fellow and control eyes at baseline and 12 months (for all, p > .05). Conclusions Our results objectively demonstrate early nuclear lens density changes using with Scheimpflug images in eyes with n-AMD that were treated with repeated ranibizumab injections for 12 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available