4.8 Article

Cool microrefugia accumulate and conserve biodiversity under climate change

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 10, Pages 3222-3235

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16143

Keywords

climate change adaptation; conservation; decoupling; freshwater rock pool; microclimate; thermophilization

Funding

  1. University of Connecticut
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [80NSSC18K1533]
  3. Second Century Stewardship Program
  4. National Science Foundation [1247393]
  5. Division Of Graduate Education
  6. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1247393] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microclimates play a crucial role in shaping the impacts of climate change, with significant temperature variations between microclimates potentially leading to greater changes in the future. Taking microclimates into account can help cold-adapted species to persist in the face of climate change, and significantly influence the distribution of warm-adapted species in local communities.传统保护策略 some of the future impacts of climate change and designing effective conservation strategies to limit biodiversity loss.
A major challenge in climate change biology is to explain why the impacts of climate change vary around the globe. Microclimates could explain some of this variation, but climate change biologists often overlook microclimates because they are difficult to map. Here, we map microclimates in a freshwater rock pool ecosystem and evaluate how accounting for microclimates alters predictions of climate change impacts on aquatic invertebrates. We demonstrate that average maximum temperature during the growing season can differ by 9.9-11.6 degrees C among microclimates less than a meter apart and this microclimate variation might increase by 21% in the future if deeper pools warm less than shallower pools. Accounting for this microclimate variation significantly alters predictions of climate change impacts on aquatic invertebrates. Predictions that exclude microclimates predict low future occupancy (0.08-0.32) and persistence probabilities (2%-73%) for cold-adapted taxa, and therefore predict decreases in gamma richness and a substantial shift toward warm-adapted taxa in local communities (i.e., thermophilization). However, predictions incorporating microclimates suggest cool locations will remain suitable for cold-adapted taxa in the future, no change in gamma richness, and 825% less thermophilization. Our models also suggest that cool locations will become suitable for warm-adapted taxa and will therefore accumulate biodiversity in the future, which makes cool locations essential for biodiversity conservation. Simulated protection of the 10 coolest microclimates (9% of locations on the landscape) results in a 100% chance of conserving all focal taxa in the future. In contrast, protecting the 10 currently most biodiverse locations, a commonly employed conservation strategy, results in a 3% chance of conserving all focal taxa in the future. Our study suggests that we must account for microclimates if we hope to understand the future impacts of climate change and design effective conservation strategies to limit biodiversity loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available