4.8 Article

Daytime warming triggers tree growth decline in the Northern Hemisphere

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 16, Pages 4832-4844

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16238

Keywords

daytime warming; drought; nighttime warming; tree growth; tree-ring width

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB31010300]
  2. Sichuan University [1082204112606, 2020SCUNL207, SCU2021D006]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0505203]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31590821, 41977396, 91731301]
  5. Thousand Youth Talents Plan of China [00204054A1082]
  6. Thousand Talents Plan of Sichuan Province [0082204151585]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized extensive data to investigate the influence of daytime and nighttime temperature asymmetry on tree growth. It found that daytime warming had a greater impact on drought stress, and tree growth was more sensitive to drought stress in warm regions.
Global warming has been linked to declines in tree growth. However, it is unclear how the asymmetry in daytime and nighttime warming influences this response. Here, we use 2947 residual tree-ring width chronologies covering 32 species at 2493 sites, between 1901 and 2018, across the Northern Hemisphere, to analyze the effects of daytime and nighttime temperatures, precipitation, and drought stress on the radial growth of trees. We show that drought stress was primarily triggered by daytime rather than nighttime warming. The radial growth of trees was more sensitive to drought stress in warm regions than in cold regions, especially for angiosperms. Our study provides robust evidence that daytime warming is the primary driver of the observed declines in forest productivity related to drought stress and that daytime and nighttime warming should be considered separately when modelling forest-climate interactions and feedbacks in a future, warmer world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available