3.9 Article

Barriers and Facilitators to Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Australian Rural Health Services: A Pilot Study

Journal

GERIATRICS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics7020035

Keywords

cognitive impairment; cognitive screening; older people; rural health

Funding

  1. La Trobe University Research Focus Area-Building Healthy Communities [2000003074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This qualitative pilot study examines the barriers and facilitators to cognitive screening for older people in rural and regional Victoria, Australia. The study highlights the importance of legislation, staff buy-in, clinical experience, appropriate training, and interorganisational relationships as key facilitators for screening. Additionally, collaborative implementation processes, time, and workloads were identified as considerations in a tertiary care setting.
Australian National standards recommend routine screening for all adults over 65 years by health organisations that provide care for patients with cognitive impairment. Despite this, screening rates are low and, when implemented, screening is often not done well. This qualitative pilot study investigates barriers and facilitators to cognitive screening for older people in rural and regional Victoria, Australia. Focus groups and interviews were undertaken with staff across two health services. Data were analysed via thematic analysis and contextualized within the i-PARIHS framework. Key facilitators of screening included legislation, staff buy-in, clinical experience, appropriate training, and interorganisational relationships. Collaborative implementation processes, time, and workloads were considerations in a recently accredited tertiary care setting. Lack of specialist services, familiarity with patients, and infrastructural issues may be barriers exacerbated in rural settings. In lieu of rural specialist services, interorganisational relationships should be leveraged to facilitate referring 'outwards' rather than 'upwards'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available