4.7 Article

Magnetic Biosignatures of Magnetosomal Greigite From Micromagnetic Calculation

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL098437

Keywords

biogenic greigite; magnetosome; micromagnetic simulation; magnetic biosignature; magnetic orientation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41974074]
  2. Royal Society-Newton Advanced Fellowship - NSFC [42061130214, NAF\R1\201096]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By constructing micromagnetic models with realistic biogenic greigite particles, this study provides reliable magnetic criteria to detect biogenic greigite in a wide range of environmental and geological settings.
Greigite magnetosomes produced by magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) are widely distributed in natural environments, but large uncertainties remain regarding their magnetic biosignatures. Here, we have constructed micromagnetic models with realistic biogenic greigite particles to quantify the magnetic properties and magnetotaxis efficiency of greigite-producing MTB cells. Our calculations suggest coercivity (B-c) of similar to 15-21 mT for intact greigite-producing rod-shaped MTB and many-celled magnetotactic prokaryotes, with B-c decreasing to similar to 11 mT for greigite magnetofossils with clumped particles. These magnetic signatures make biogenic greigite distinguishable from typical biogenic magnetite and inorganic greigite, providing reliable magnetic criteria to detect biogenic greigite in a wide range of environmental and geological settings. Our numerical calculations suggest that rod-shaped greigite-producing MTB have a similar magnetotaxis efficiency to magnetite MTB, likely by biomineralizing more greigite crystals to compensate for the lower saturation magnetization of greigite and less ordered chains in greigite MTB cells, demonstrating biological-controlled optimization of their magnetic nanostructure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available