4.7 Article

Summer-Winter Contrast in the Response of Precipitation Extremes to Climate Change Over Northern Hemisphere Land

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL096531

Keywords

precipitation; extremes; climate models; dynamics; thermodynamics; observations

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council, Oxford DTP [NE/S007474/1]
  2. Laidlaw Research and Leadership Programme
  3. NSF [AGS-1552195, AGS-1749986]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate models project distinct seasonality in future changes of extreme precipitation. The difference between summer and winter responses in the extratropical Northern Hemisphere can be explained by negative and positive dynamic contributions, as well as an anomalously strong thermodynamic contribution. The weakened ascent and decreased near-surface relative humidity in northern summer contribute to the weaker summer response.
Climate models project a distinct seasonality to future changes in daily extreme precipitation. In particular, models project that over land in the extratropical Northern Hemisphere the summer response is substantially weaker than the winter response in percentage terms. Here we decompose the projected response into thermodynamic and dynamic contributions and show that the seasonal contrast arises due to a negative dynamic contribution in northern summer, and a positive dynamic contribution and an anomalously strong thermodynamic contribution in northern winter. The negative dynamic contribution in northern summer is due to weakened ascent and is strongly correlated with decreases in mean near-surface relative humidity. Finally, we show that the summer-winter contrast is also evident in observed trends of daily precipitation extremes in northern midlatitudes, which provides support for the contrast found in climate-model simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available