4.7 Article

Superior Daily and Sub-Daily Precipitation Statistics for Intense and Long-Lived Storms in Global Storm-Resolving Models

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL096759

Keywords

precipitation; GCM; global storm-resolving models; diurnal cycle

Funding

  1. Regional and Global Model Analysis program area of the US Department of Energy
  2. Atmospheric System Research program of the US Department of Energy
  3. US Department of Energy by LLNL [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates daily and sub-daily precipitation statistics from three global model ensembles. The results show that global storm-resolving models (GSRMs) perform better in statistics of heavier rain rate events, while high-resolution and standard-resolution models fail to accurately simulate the diurnal cycle and propagation of precipitation.
Daily and sub-daily precipitation statistics are investigated from three global model ensembles: (a) global storm-resolving models (GSRMs) with typical horizontal resolutions of similar to 4 km, (b) high-resolution global models with typical resolutions of similar to 50 km and (c) standard-resolution global models with typical resolutions of similar to 100 km. Compared to two satellite rainfall datasets, GSRMs convincingly exhibit superior performance for statistics of heavier rain rate events including their diurnal cycle, spatial propagation and the amount contributed by intense precipitation, but not for statistics of weaker or shorter duration precipitation. Both high- and standard-resolution models fail to simulate the correct phase and amplitude of diurnal cycle of precipitation and the propagating convection in the Central US, but high-resolution models show relative improvement in the distribution of precipitation frequency and amount, especially for intense precipitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available