4.7 Article

Mechanism for the Uplift of Gongga Shan in the Southeastern Tibetan Plateau Constrained by 3D Magnetotelluric Data

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL097394

Keywords

eastern Tibetan Plateau; Gongga Shan; uplift; magnetotelluric

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics of China [LED2015A01]
  2. National Institute of Natural Hazards, Ministry of Emergency Management of the P.R.C. [ZDJ2019-26]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 3D resistivity model of the Gongga Shan region obtained through inversion of magnetotelluric data reveals that the uplift of the mountain is primarily attributed to the underthrusting of the Yangtze Craton, with additional uplift possibly due to transpression on a restraining bend of the Xianshuihe faults. This model challenges previously published geodynamic models and provides new insights into the geological processes at play in the region.
Gongga Shan (GGS) is the highest mountain on the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. However, the mechanism for the uplift of Gongga Shan is still unclear due to a lack of detailed geophysical studies. Inversion of an array of magnetotelluric data at 120 sites produced a 3D resistivity model that revealed that the GGS massif is characterized by a high resistivity upper crust underlain by a westward dipping resistor at middle crustal depths that is interpreted as the underthrust Yangtze Craton (YC). A thin conductive layer is sandwiched between these two zones of high resistivity. This resistivity model is inconsistent with previously published geodynamic models. Based on the new magnetotelluric results, we propose that the uplift of Gongga Shan occurs primarily by underthrusting of the YC. Additional uplift may be due to transpression on a restraining bend of the oblique-slip Xianshuihe faults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available