4.7 Article

Quantification of Volcano Deformation Caused by Volatile Accumulation and Release

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL097502

Keywords

3D modeling; buoyancy; volcanic uplift; scaling analysis; magmatic gases; Calbuco

Funding

  1. European Research Council through the MAGMA project, ERC Consolidator Grant [771143]
  2. Projekt DEAL
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [771143] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses numerical modeling results to quantify the ground deformation caused by volatile reservoirs, highlighting the crucial role of volatile-driven buoyancy in volcano deformation and the significant impact of shallow volatile accumulation and release on ground deformation of volcanoes.
Crustal-stored magma reservoirs contain exsolved volatiles which accumulate in the reservoir roof, exerting a buoyancy force on the crust. This produces surface uplift and sudden loss of volatiles through eruption results in syn-eruptive subsidence. Here, we present three-dimensional, visco-elasto-plastic, numerical modeling results which quantify the ground deformation arising from the growth and release of a volatile reservoir. Deformation is mostly independent of crustal thermal distribution and volatile reservoir shape, but is a function of volatile volume, density and depth and crustal rigidity. We present a scaling law for the volatiles' contribution to syn-eruptive subsidence and show this contributes similar to 20% of the observed subsidence associated with the 2015 Calbuco eruption. Our results highlight the key role that volatile-driven buoyancy can have in volcano deformation, show a new link between syn-eruptive degassing and deflation, and highlight that shallow volatile accumulation and release may have a significant impact on ground deformation of volcanoes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available