4.5 Article

Central and peripheral delivered AAV9-SMN are both efficient but target different pathomechanisms in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy

Journal

GENE THERAPY
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 544-554

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41434-022-00338-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Muscular Dystrophy Association (USA) [575466]
  2. Muscular Dystrophy Canada
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [PJT-156379]
  4. CNMD STAR Award from the University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Institute
  5. Frederick Banting and Charles Best CIHR Doctoral Research Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disease caused by loss of the SMN1 gene and low SMN protein levels. Current gene therapy and clinical trials for SMA have shown significant improvement in the clinical phenotype but not a complete cure. This study demonstrates the independent contribution of peripheral organs to SMA pathology and suggests that treatments should not be restricted to motor neurons.
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disease caused by loss of the SMN1 gene and low SMN protein levels. Although lower motor neurons are a primary target, there is evidence that peripheral organ defects contribute to SMA. Current SMA gene therapy and clinical trials use a single intravenous bolus of the blood-brain-barrier penetrant scAAV9-cba-SMN by either systemic or central nervous system (CNS) delivery, resulting in impressive amelioration of the clinical phenotype but not a complete cure. The impact of scAAV9-cba-SMN treatment regimens on the CNS as well as on specific peripheral organs is yet to be described in a comparative manner. Therefore, we injected SMA mice with scAAV9-cba-SMN either intravenously (IV) for peripheral SMN restoration or intracerebroventricularly (ICV) for CNS-focused SMN restoration. In our system, ICV injections increased SMN in peripheral organs and the CNS while IV administration increased SMN in peripheral tissues only, largely omitting the CNS. Both treatments rescued several peripheral phenotypes while only ICV injections were neuroprotective. Surprisingly, both delivery routes resulted in a robust rescue effect on survival, weight, and motor function, which in IV-treated mice relied on peripheral SMN restoration but not on targeting the motor neurons. This demonstrates the independent contribution of peripheral organs to SMA pathology and suggests that treatments should not be restricted to motor neurons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available