4.6 Article

Genetic profiles of non-syndromic severe-profound hearing loss in Chinese Hans by whole-exome sequencing

Journal

GENE
Volume 819, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.146258

Keywords

Deafness; Variant; Whole-exome sequencing; Gene

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang, China [2018C03027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, whole-exome sequencing was used to investigate the genetic causes of severe-profound hearing loss in Chinese Han children. Several novel genes and variants associated with hearing loss were identified, expanding our understanding of the heterogeneity of hereditary hearing loss.
Hereditary hearing loss is highly heterogeneous. Despite over 120 non-syndromic deafness genes have been identified, there are still some of novel genes and variants being explored. In the study, we investigated 105 Chinese Han children with non-syndromic, prelingual, severe-profound hearing loss by whole-exome sequencing on DNA samples. The most common deafness gene was GJB2, mainly in variant c.235delC (p.Leu79CysfsTer3). 14 children were identified with pathogenic mutations in three genes, GJB2, SLC26A4, and OTOF. Two mutations have been identified to be pathogenic and not recorded previously, including c.4691G > A (p.Trp1564Ter) and c.3928_3930dup (p.Lys1310dup) in OTOF. The rare variants c.1349G > A (p.Arg450His) and c.456 T > G (p. Asn152Lys) in GSDME, and c.1595G > T (p.Ser532Ile) in SLC26A4 were detected. The frequency of nonsense variant c.2359G > T (p.Glu787Ter) in OTOA was very high in 17 cases. Four of them were identified to be digenic inheritance, including GJB2 and COL4A4, GJB2 and EYA1, GJB2 and COL4A5, and GJB2 and DFNA5. The findings showed that a novel pathogenic variant and rare variants may be associated with severe and profound hearing loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available