4.7 Article

Incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP with anesthesia assistance: a multicenter observational study

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 269-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.023

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of general anesthesia and sedation without planned intubation on the incidence of hypoxemia and hypotension during ERCP and explored risk factors for the conversion from sedation without planned intubation to general anesthesia. The results showed that general anesthesia was associated with a lower incidence of hypoxemia, while sedation without planned intubation was associated with a lower incidence of hypotension. However, neither approach showed a clear advantage in the combined incidence of hypoxemia and hypotension.
Background and Aims: Anesthesia assistance is commonly used for ERCP. General anesthesia (GA) may provide greater airway protection but may lead to hypotension. We aimed to compare GA versus sedation without planned intubation (SWPI) on the incidence of hypoxemia and hypotension. We also explored risk factors for conversion from SWPI to GA. Methods: This observational study used data from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I to IV undergoing ERCP between 2006 and 2019 were included. We compared GA and SWPI on incidence of hypoxemia (oxygen saturation <90% for >= 3 minutes) and hypotension (mean arterial pressure <65 mm Hg for >= 5 minutes) using joint hypothesis testing. The association between anesthetic approach and outcomes was assessed using logistic regression. The noninferiority delta for hypoxemia and hypotension was an odds ratio of 1.20. One approach was deemed better if it was noninferior on both outcomes and superior on at least 1 outcome. To explore risk factors associated with conversion from SWPI to GA, we constructed a logistic regression model. Results: Among 61,735 cases from 42 institutions, 38,830 (63%) received GA and 22,905 (37%) received SWPI. The GA group had 1.27 times (97.5% confidence interval, 1.19-1.35) higher odds of hypotension but.71 times (97.5% confidence interval,.63-.80) lower odds of hypoxemia. Neither group was noninferior to the other on both outcomes. Conversion from SWPI to GA occurred in 6.5% of cases and was associated with baseline comorbidities and higher institutional procedure volume. Conclusions: GA for ERCP was associated with less hypoxemia, whereas SWPI was associated with less hypotension. Neither approach was better on the combined incidence of hypotension and hypoxemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available