4.7 Article

Blockchain-based random auditor committee for integrity verification

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2022.01.019

Keywords

Cloud storage; Integrity verification; Random auditor committee; Election algorithm; Blockchain

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation ofChina [62072105, 61872087]
  2. NaturalScience Foundation of Fujian Province, China
  3. Center-initiated Research Project of Zhejiang Lab, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a blockchain-based random auditor committee (BRAC) scheme for integrity verification of outsourced data. The scheme utilizes a verifiable random function to select a third-party auditor committee for contract verification, and improves security through the randomness of leader election.
With the popularity of cloud storage, integrity verification for outsourced data has attracted more and more attention. The majority of existing research works rely on a unique third-party auditor (TPA) or fixed TPAs to audit the integrity of outsourced data, and thus they are vulnerable to DoS and collusion attacks as the TPA is not completely trusted. To conquer this problem, a blockchain-based random auditor committee is proposed to replace the fixed TPAs for the integrity verification (call BRAC scheme for short). The proposed blockchain consensus algorithm utilizes a verifiable random function (VRF) to select the third-party auditor committee (TPAC) which performs contract verification. The leader of TPAs (LTPA) packs the verification proof into a blockchain called verification chain. The main idea is employing the output of a VRF for leader election to make it probabilistic, such that specific nodes cannot be targeted in advance and a certain fraction of the nodes being malicious can be tolerated. We present rigorous security analysis to demonstrate the security of the proposed scheme. Meanwhile, the comprehensive performance evaluation shows that the proposed scheme improves the performance of data integrity verification effectively. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available