4.7 Article

Removal characteristics of particulate matters and hazardous trace elements in a 660 MW ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant

Journal

FUEL
Volume 311, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122535

Keywords

Removal characteristics; Particulate matter; Trace elements; Ultra-low emission; Coal-fired power plant

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0600604]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876039]
  3. Natural science fund for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province [19KJB470034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coal is the primary energy source in China, but the emissions from coal-fired power plants have caused severe environmental problems. In recent years, China has implemented strict regulations to limit air pollutant emissions from these plants. A field sampling test of a 660 MW ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant showed that electrostatic precipitators and wet electrostatic precipitators had high mass removal efficiency for particulate matters, primarily PM2.5. Additionally, analysis of trace elements showed that manganese content was independent of particle size, while chromium, arsenic, and lead were mainly enriched in fine ash particles.
Coal is the dominant energy source in China, and coal-fired power plant (CFPP) accounts for about half of coal consumption. However, air pollutant emissions from coal-fired power plants cause severe environmental and ecological problems. The most stringent regulations to limit air pollutant emissions from CFPP have been implemented in China since 2015. The ultra-low emission standards require that particulate matters (PMs) concentration from stack must not exceed 5 mg/Nm(3). For exploring the emission characteristics of particulate matters and some trace elements, the field sampling test was carried out in a 660 MW ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant. It is equipped with low temperature economizer (LTE), electrostatic precipitators (ESP), wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD), and wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP). The results showed that the mass removal efficiency of PM10 is about 80% in ESP and about 70% in WESP, in which most of them are PM2.5. The mass concentration removal efficiency of PM10 was 98.77% in ESP while that of PM2.5 is 98.58%. The mass concentration removal efficiency of PM10 was 63.43% in WESP while tat of PM2.5 is 71.92%. At the same time, the trace elements on different particle sizes were analyzed. Manganese contents were found to be independent of the particle size. Cr, As and Pb are mainly enriched in the fine ash particles. In terms of the emission factors, Cr, As, Pb, and Mn are mainly in the fine particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available