4.7 Article

Twitter data reveal six distinct environmental personas

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 481-487

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fee.2510

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. David H Smith Conservation Research Fellowship
  2. National Institute of Mathematical and Biological Synthesis and Pomona College

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effective digital environmental communication is crucial for mobilizing public support in the social media age. This study provides the first systematic characterization of environmental personas on social media, offering strategies to target different audiences and tailor messages for environmental advocates.
Effective digital environmental communication is integral to galvanizing public support for conservation in the age of social media. Environmental advocates require messaging strategies suited to social media platforms, including ways to identify, target, and mobilize distinct audiences. Here, we provide - to the best of our knowledge - the first systematic characterization of environmental personas on social media. Beginning with 1 million environmental nongovernmental organization (NGO) followers on Twitter, of which 500,000 users met data quality criteria, we identified six personas that differ in their expression of 21 environmental issues. General consistency in the proportional composition of personas was detected across 14 countries with sufficiently large samples. Within the US, although the six personas varied in their mean political ideology, we did not observe that the personas split along political party lines. Our results pave the way for environmental advocates - including NGOs, public agencies, and researchers - to use audience segmentation methods like the methods discussed here to target and tailor messages to distinct constituencies at high speed and at large scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available