4.7 Article

Incidence of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Among Subjects at High Risk of Lung Cancer: Results From the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study

Journal

CANCER
Volume 121, Issue 9, Pages 1431-1435

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29189

Keywords

head and neck cancer; lung cancer; incidence; high-risk; screening

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [P50 CA097190, P50 CA090440, P30 CA047904]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDEarlier detection and diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) should lead to improved outcomes. However, to the authors' knowledge, no effective screening strategy has been identified to date. In the current study, the authors evaluated whether it would be useful to screen subjects targeted for lung cancer screening for HNSCC as well. METHODSMedical records, death certificates, and cancer registry and questionnaire data were used to determine the number of observed incident HNSCC cases in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS), a cohort of current and former smokers aged 50 years with a 12.5 pack-year smoking history. The expected number of cases was estimated using stratum-specific incidence rates obtained from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data for 2000 through 2011. The standardized incidence ratio was calculated to examine the difference between the observed and expected number of cases. RESULTSOf the 3587 at-risk participants in the PLuSS, 23 (0.64%) developed HNSCC over a total of 32,201 person-years of follow-up. This finding was significantly higher than expected based on incidence rates obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (13.70 cases expected; standardized incidence ratio, 1.68 [95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.52]). The excess burden of HNSCC in the PLuSS was 28.9 cases per 100,000 person-years. Observed incident cases were significantly more often male, had started smoking at a younger age, smoked more per day, and had more pack-years of smoking than the rest of the PLuSS at-risk participants. CONCLUSIONSThe results of the current study provide a rationale for offering head and neck cancer screening along with computed tomography screening for lung cancer. Randomized controlled trials that assess the effectiveness of adding examination of the head and neck area to lung cancer screening programs are warranted. Cancer 2015;121:1431-1435. (c) 2015 American Cancer Society. Earlier diagnosis of head and neck cancer should lead to improved outcomes. However, because head and neck cancer is relatively rare, screening of the general population is impractical. Results from the current study provide a rationale for offering head and neck cancer screening along with low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available