4.7 Article

Controlling risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in essential workers of enclosed food manufacturing facilities

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108632

Keywords

COVID-19; Quantitative microbial risk assessment; Vaccination; Aerosol; Droplet; And fomite-mediated transmission

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health T32 grant [2T32ES012870-16]
  2. National Insti-tute of Food and Agriculture at the U.S. Department of Agriculture [2019-67017-29642, 2020-67034-31728]
  3. National Institute General Medical Sciences [R01 GM124280, R01 GM124280-03S1]
  4. National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [T32AI138952]
  5. Emory University
  6. the Infectious Disease Across Scales Training Program (IDASTP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The global pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 poses significant health risks to essential workers in the food supply chain. A study utilizing a quantitative risk assessment model demonstrated that implementing infection control measures, such as physical distancing, mask use, ventilation, surface disinfection, and vaccination, can greatly reduce the risk of infection for frontline workers in a fresh fruit and vegetable manufacturing facility.
The SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic poses significant health risks to workers who are essential to maintaining the food supply chain. Using a quantitative risk assessment model, this study characterized the impact of risk reduction strategies for controlling SARS-CoV-2 transmission (droplet, aerosol, fomite-mediated) among frontline workers in a representative indoor fresh fruit and vegetable manufacturing facility. We simulated: 1) individual and cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection risks from close contact (droplet and aerosols at 1-3 m), aerosol, and fomite-mediated exposures to a susceptible worker following exposure to an infected worker during an 8 hshift; and 2) the relative reduction in SARS-CoV-2 infection risk attributed to infection control interventions (physical distancing, mask use, ventilation, surface disinfection, hand hygiene, vaccination). Without mitigation measures, the SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was largest for close contact (droplet and aerosol) at 1 m (0.96, 5th - 95th percentile: 0.67-1.0). In comparison, risk associated with fomite (0.26, 5th - 95th percentile: 0.10-0.56) or aerosol exposure alone (0.05, 5th - 95th percentile: 0.01-0.13) at 1 m distance was substantially lower (73-95%). At 1 m, droplet transmission predominated over aerosol and fomite-mediated transmission, however, this changed by 3 m, with aerosols comprising the majority of the exposure dose. Increasing physical distancing reduced risk by 84% (1-2 m) and 91% (1-3 m). Universal mask use reduced infection risk by 52-88%, depending on mask type. Increasing ventilation (from 0.1 to 2-8 air changes/hour) resulted in risk reductions of 14-54% (1 m) and 55-85% (2 m). Combining these strategies, together with handwashing and surface disinfection, resulted in <1% infection risk. Partial or full vaccination of the susceptible worker resulted in risk reductions of 73-92% (1 m risk range: 0.08-0.26). However, vaccination paired with other interventions (ACH 2, mask use, or distancing) was necessary to achieve infection risks <1%. Current industry SARS-CoV-2 risk reduction strategies, particularly when bundled, provide significant protection to essential food workers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available