4.7 Article

Could environmental effect overcome genetic? A chemometric study on wheat volatiles fingerprint

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 372, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131236

Keywords

Volatile organic compounds; GC-MS; Wheat species; Cultivation year; Multivariate analysis; Farm elevation

Funding

  1. Con-sorzio di Ricerca per l'Innovazione Tecnologica, la Qualita e la Sicurezza degli Alimenti (Research Consortium for Technological Innovation, Quality and Safety of Foods) of the Abruzzo region [DM 61316]
  2. MIUR (Ministry of Instruction, University and Research, Italy)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study analyzing volatile organic compounds in wheat grown at different altitudes over two years found that the year of cultivation was the primary source of VOCs variance, with environmental conditions playing a more significant role than species in determining the VOCs profile.
A deeper knowledge of the causes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) variance in wheat is crucial for quality improvement and control of its derivatives. The VOCs profile of common and durum wheat kernels grown in different fields sited at different altitudes over two years was analysed and 149 compounds were identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Principal component analysis evidenced that the year of cultivation was the highest source of VOCs variance. The effects of wheat origin, as described by the cultivation site, its elevation, and species were further investigated by PLS-DA, that permitted to correctly classify wheat of different origin on the basis of its VOCs profile. The importance of the different effects was investigated by multidimensional test and resulted: year of cultivation > field of cultivation > species > altitude. Findings suggest that environmental conditions are more important than species in the determination of the VOCs variance of wheat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available