4.7 Article

Simultaneous screening and analysis of 155 veterinary drugs in livestock foods using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem quadrupole linear-ion-trap mass spectrometry

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 393, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133260

Keywords

Multi-residue analysis; Livestock foods; Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography; tandemquadrupole linear-ion-trap mass spec-trometry; Veterinary drugs; Qualitative screening; Quantitative analysis

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1601706]
  2. State Administration for Market Regulation Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A high-throughput method based on liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry was developed for simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis of 155 veterinary drugs in livestock foods.
Veterinary drugs are widely used to improve the health and growth of livestock. The supervision of these residues is necessary to ensure food safety. A high-throughput method based on Oasis PRiME HLB with solid phase extraction for simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis of 155 veterinary drugs in livestock foods was developed by the ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem quadrupole linear-ion-trap mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTRAP-MS). The limits of detection and quantification ranged from 0.5 mu g/kg to 5 mu g/kg and 2 mu g/kg to 20 mu g/kg, respectively. For over 85% of the analytes, the recoveries were between 60% and 120%. The positive simulated samples perfectly matched with a purity fit value over 70% from the self-built library. The screening results of UHPLC-QTRAP-MS were almost consistent with UHPLC tandem quadrupole-exactive orbitrap mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap/MS). The evaluated UHPLC-QTRAP-MS method was powerful and reliable for the screening and quantification of veterinary drugs in real samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available