4.7 Article

Establishment of an appropriate method for determining multiple heterocyclic amines in soy products processed with various methods

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 375, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131905

Keywords

Heterocyclic amines (HAs); Soy products; Domestic cooking; Dietary exposure assessment; Analysis; QuEChERS

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 1072314-B-010-064-MY2, 109-2320-B-010-025, 110-2320-B-A49A-517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method using UPLC-MS/MS and a core-shell C18 column was developed to simultaneously determine 21 heterocyclic amines in 15 min. Cooking temperature and time were found to affect the HAs content in the samples, with fried foods showing higher levels. Norharman and Harman were identified as the main contributors to HAs content in all samples.
A method using UPLC-MS/MS and a core-shell C18 column was developed to simultaneously determine 21 heterocyclic amines (HAs) in 15 min. Appropriate QuEChERS conditions were also established to conveniently extract HAs from soy products cooked with various methods. These conditions presented good analytical per-formance; limit of detection, limit of quantification, recovery (%), repeatability (coefficient of variation (CV) %) and intermediate precision (CV%) were 0.008 -0.150 ng/g, 0.025 -0.500 ng/g, 62 -91%, < 28% and < 23% for tofu sample, and 0.003 -0.100 ng/g, 0.010 -0.350 ng/g, 64 -93%, < 19% and < 20% for soy milk sample, respectively. HAs contents in the samples increased with cooking temperature and time. The tofu samples cooked by frying had much higher HAs content than those cooked by boiling and roasting. Norharman and Harman mainly contributed HAs content in all samples. For the general population in Taiwan, the highest estimated level of HAs consumed from the samples is 373.67 ng/day.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available