4.7 Article

Selective carbonaceous-based (nano)composite sensors for electrochemical determination of paraquat in food samples

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 373, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131521

Keywords

Biochar; Graphene oxide; Electrodes; Selective analysis; Pesticide

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - CAPES
  3. Fundacao de Apoio 'a Pesquisa e a Inovacao Tecnologica do Estado de Sergipe - EDITAL CAPES/FAPITEC/PROMOB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel electrochemical sensor based on activated biochar and reduced graphene oxide was developed for the detection of paraquat in food samples. The sensor showed good response and high selectivity under optimized conditions, with a linear range from 0.74 to 9.82 μmol L-1 and a limit of detection of 0.02 μmol L-1.
A novel electrochemical sensor based on activated biochar (AB4) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was developed and tested for detection of paraquat (PQ) in food samples. Precursor biochar was obtained by the pyrolysis of water hyacinth biomass at 400, 500, and 600 degrees C, followed by a chemical activation step using HNO3 to increase the amount of oxygenated and nitrogenated groups. The modified electrodes (rGO-AB4) were tested in different experimental conditions, and exhibited good response under the optimized conditions, showing linearity from 0.74 to 9.82 mu mol L -1 and a limit of detection and limit of quantification of 0.02 mu mol L-1 and 0.07 mu mol L-1, respectively. Interfering species such as glyphosate caused insignificant changes in the peak current of paraquat, and the selectivity of the method was tested using blank and spiked samples of coconut water, wastewater, honey, lettuce and lemon. Recovery ranged from 87.70 +/- 2.07% to 103.80 +/- 3.94%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available