4.7 Article

Comprehensive proteomic analysis of sea cucumbers (Stichopus japonicus) in thermal processing by HPLC-MS/MS

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 373, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131368

Keywords

Stichopus japonicus; Thermal processing; Hydrolysis site; Proteomic analysis; Mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD0901004, 2018YFC1706600]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2019-YQ-07]
  3. Dalian Science and Technology Innovation Foundation [2019J11CY019]
  4. DICP [DICP I202007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a proteomic strategy, this study analyzed the effects of different thermal processing methods on the protein composition of sea cucumbers. Despite a relatively high protein loss rate, the main types of protein composition were retained. The findings have important implications for optimizing thermal processing in the sea cucumber industry.
Thermal processing is the most frequently adopted processing technology for sea cucumbers, which can significantly affect their protein composition. In this paper, three thermal processing methods high pressure steaming (HPS), atmospheric pressure boiling (APB), and atmospheric pressure steaming (APS) were adopted and protein compositions of both body walls and cooking liquors by thermal processing stichopus japonicus were systematically analysis by proteomic strategy. The total proteins loss rates of body walls were 11.6%, 13.0%, and 14.8% for HPS, APS, and APB methods, respectively. However, the main types of protein composition were retained. Similar mechanisms of protein loss may exist even if different thermal processing were applied. The most frequent hydrolysis sites in thermal processing were phenylalanine, leucine, asparagine, and tyrosine at both C and N terminals. This study provides theoretical guidance for optimizing the industry thermal processing of sea cucumbers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available