4.7 Article

Dynamic release and perception of key odorants in grilled eel during chewing

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 378, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132073

Keywords

Grilled eel; Mastication; APCI-MS; MS-nose; Odorants release; Dynamic monitoring

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32072247]
  2. Key Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province [2020JH1/10200001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry to monitor in real-time the key odorants released from grilled eel during mastication. The results showed that the release and perception of odorants during mastication can be divided into three distinct phases, and recommended extending the chewing period and increasing the chewing frequency to optimize the consumer experience.
The release mechanism of odorants in the oral cavity during consumption directly affects sensory attributes, consumers' preferences, and ultimately purchase intent. Targets was set to monitor in real-time the key odorants released from grilled eel during mastication via an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (APCI-MS) connected with a nose interface. The release and perception of odorants during mastication were divided into three distinct phases. Dimethyl sulfide was the main odorant in the first stage. The release and perception of fishy aromas were predominant in the middle and last stages of mastication contributed by tri-methylamine, 1-penten-3-ol, and 2-methyl-1-butanol. Chewing behavior experiments suggested that extending the chewing period to >20 s and having a chewing frequency of 2 cycles/s could enhance the aroma delivery of grilled eel and optimize the consumer experience. Consequently, the results explained the relationship between aroma release and the optimal chewing behavior for grilled eel consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available