4.5 Article

Thermodynamic study on carbon dioxide absorption in vinyl imidazolium-amino acid ionic liquids

Journal

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
Volume 557, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2022.113433

Keywords

Vinyl imidazolium; Amino acid ionic liquids; Absorption; CO2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vinyl imidazolium amino acid ionic liquids (AAILs) based on seven amino acids were synthesized and used as carbon dioxide absorbers. The CO2 absorption capacity of these AAILs was affected by pressure and temperature, with [VBIm][L-Arg] demonstrating the highest absorption capacity.
Vinyl imidazolium amino acid ionic liquids (AAILs) based on seven amino acids (L-lysine [L-Lys], L-arginine [L-Arg], L-alanine [L-Ala], glycine [Gly]), L-proline [L-Pro], L-histidine [L-Hist], and L-valine [L-Val]) were synthesized and characterized as carbon dioxide absorbers. The absorption of carbon dioxide (CO2) gas in these AAILs was measured by quartz crystal microbalance sensor (QCM) at over 283.15-313.15 K temperature range and pressures up to 4 bar. According to the sorption mechanism, the experimental CO2 absorption in AAILs was correlated by the deactivated model. The thermodynamic parameters including the Henry's law constant, reaction equilibrium constant, and enthalpy of physical sorption were used to calculate the AAILs application potential as CO2 capture. The CO2 absorption increased with pressure and decreased with temperature. The results manifest that absorption capacities of CO2 were in the sequence of [VBIm][L-Arg] > [VBIm][L-Lys] > [VBIm][L-His] > [VBIm][Gly] > [VBIm][L-Ala] > [VBIm][L-Val] > [VBIm][L-Pro]. Amongst the studied amino acids, the highest CO2 absorption capacity was obtained for [VBIm][L-Arg] due to the availability of more amino groups. Besides, CO2 absorbed chemically was confirmed by carbamate formation using FT-IR spectroscopy. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available