4.5 Article

Do cage fish farms promote interference in the trophic niche of wild fish in neotropical reservoir?

Journal

FISHERIES RESEARCH
Volume 248, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106198

Keywords

Aquaculture; Feeding; Feed intake; Wild ichthyofauna; Niche breadth; Niche overlap

Categories

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [443103/2014-3, 457083/2014-0, 132454/2016-5, 303311/2018-5]
  3. Fundacao para o Desenvolvimento da UNESP/Pro-reitoria de pesquisa da UNESP [0305/001/14-PROPe/CDC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cage fish farming in hydroelectric reservoirs can affect the foraging behavior and diet composition of wild fish. Understanding the impact of fish farms on wild fish species and maintaining fish stocks are important considerations.
Cage fish farming in hydroelectric reservoirs has been reported to promote variations in environmental conditions, which directly interfere with the foraging behavior of wild fish. We have hypothesized that the abundance of foods derived from fish farming activities alters the interspecific relationships of wild fish. To test this, we evaluated the diet composition, trophic niche breadth, and trophic niche overlap of the wild fish fauna sampled in two areas (cage farm and control area). Changes in diet composition between areas were observed, resulting in contraction of the trophic niche, and partitioning of food resources in the cage farm area. These results indicate the complexity of the influence of cage fish farms and demonstrate the importance of studies on the wild fish fauna under the influence of these systems. Furthermore, the species evaluated here have economic potential for local fishing, and our results suggest the maintenance of fish stocks in the short term due to the energy supply of the cages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available