4.6 Article

'Destructive fishing'-A ubiquitously used but vague term? Usage and impacts across academic research, media and policy

Journal

FISH AND FISHERIES
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 1039-1054

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/faf.12668

Keywords

conservation; fishing policy; food security; marine environment; ocean habitat; sustainable fishing

Categories

Funding

  1. Cambridge Conservation Initiative Collaborative Fund
  2. Henslow Fellowship at Murray Edwards College
  3. Woolf Fisher Scholarship
  4. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge
  5. Arcadia - a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically reviewed the use of 'destructive fishing' in academic literature, media articles, and policy documents. The term 'destructive fishing' has seen increased usage since the 1990s compared to the generic term 'fisheries.' It predominantly focuses on fishing practices in Southeastern Asia, with bottom trawling and unspecified net fishing commonly associated with destructive fishing. The use of the term differs among academic literature, media articles, and policy documents.
The term 'destructive fishing' appears in multiple international policy instruments intended to improve outcomes for marine biodiversity, coastal communities and sustainable fisheries. However, the meaning of 'destructive fishing' is often vague, limiting effectiveness in policy. Therefore, in this study, we systematically reviewed the use of 'destructive fishing' in three record types: academic literature, media articles and policy documents between 1976 and 2020. A more detailed analysis was performed on subsets of these records, considering the extent to which the term is characterised, geographic distribution of use, and specific impacts and practices associated with the term. We found that use of 'destructive fishing' relative to the generic term 'fisheries' has increased since the 1990s. Records focussed predominantly on fishing practices in South-eastern Asia, followed by Southern Asia and Europe. The term was characterised in detail in only 15% of records. Habitat damage and blast/poison fishing were the most associated ecological impacts and gear/practices, respectively. Bottom trawling and unspecified net fishing were regularly linked to destructive fishing. Importantly, the three record types use the term differently. Academic literature tends to specifically articulate the negative impacts, while media articles focus generally on associated gears/practices. Significant regional variation also exists in how the term is used and what phenomena it is applied to. This study provides evidence and recommendations to inform stakeholders in any future pursuit of a unified definition of 'destructive fishing' to support more meaningful implementation of global sustainability goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available