4.7 Article

Selection for yield shifted the proportion of oil and protein in favor of low-energy seed fractions in soybean

Journal

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH
Volume 279, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108446

Keywords

Protein; Oil; Carbohydrates; Seed filling; Legumes; Breeding; Yield

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent research indicates that the increase in soybean yield is associated with a decrease in seed protein concentration and an increase in residual fraction. Modern soybean varieties show a faster accumulation of seed residual fraction and a significant decrease in seed energy requirement compared to older varieties.
Owing to the high contents of oil and protein, soybean [Glycine max L. (Merr.)] seeds are energy-rich. Genetic improvement of soybean yield is linked to the dilution in seed protein; changes in low-energy compounds such as carbohydrates have received less attention. We tested the hypothesis that selection for yield in soybean has shifted seed composition in favor of low-energy compounds. We characterized the dynamics of three seed fractions (protein, oil, and residual) during seed filling in seven commercial soybean varieties released between 1980 and 2013 in a two-year field experiment. Genetic gain in yield was linked with reduced seed energy cost: seed protein concentration decreased by 0.06% yr(-1), oil remained stable, and the residual fraction increased by 0.09% yr(-1). Seed accumulation of the residual fraction revealed a shorter lag phase and a longer effective filling period for the modern relative to the older soybean varieties. Seed energetic requirement significantly decreased - 0.06% yr(-1). Resource availability per seed during the seed-filling period was not limiting across all tested varieties. Further research is warranted on the biochemical nature of the residual fraction, and on the implications of seed composition for future breeding, soybean meal and end uses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available