3.9 Article

A role for hypnosis in cataract surgery: Report of 171 procedures

Journal

JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 287-291

Publisher

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.04.024

Keywords

Hypnosis; Cataract surgery; Ambulatiry; Intraoperative intravenous medication; Anesthesia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To study the effectiveness of relaxation hypnosis in outpatient cataract surgery. Study design. Prospective study of 171 patients undergoing cataract surgery under hypnosis, performed by the same nurse anesthetist. The procedures were performed by 2 senior surgeons, A and B (A=78 surgeries, and B = 93 surgeries) under topical anesthesia and with a 2.2-mm mini incision. The hypnosis group (n = 102) was compared to a control group (n = 69) according to quantitative, objective criteria: hemodynamic changes and the need for intravenous medication in operating room, as well as subjective, qualitative criteria: surgical comfort, effectiveness of hypnosis, and patient satisfaction. Subgroup analyses by surgeon, 1st and 2nd eye surgery, were performed. Results. Hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different between the 2 groups: systolic blood pressure (P=0.06) and maximum heart rate (P=0.25). However, the use of intraoperative intravenous medication was significantly higher in the control group (49.3% versus 21.6%, P < 0.001). The effectiveness of relaxation was scored at a mean of 5.25/6 by the nurse anesthetist. The patients in the hypnosis group reported a mean comfort rating of 8.4/10, and 100% were satisfied with this hypnosis experience. Conclusions. Preliminary results of this study are very positive for all three parties: patient/anesthetist/surgeon. They are leading to an expanded university training program for operating room personnel in order to improve quality of care and reduce premedication in elderly patients so as to facilitate their return to home. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available