4.3 Article

Critical analysis of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants and proposal for standardization

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 281-286

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2054331

Keywords

Biotribiology; friction; human tissue; lubricity; spinal implant; wear

Funding

  1. National Research Development and lnnovation Office (NKFIH) through the OTKA [K125409]
  2. 'Austrian COMET-Program' (project lnTribology) via the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) [872176]
  3. Province of Niederosterreich
  4. Province of Vorarlberg
  5. Province of Wien

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to find an industrial lubricant that is most similar to biologically lubricating fluids in order to standardize the results of in vitro mechanical tests and prevent biological hazards.
Background The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), considered the gold standard worldwide, requires only testing in physiological saline solution to simulate in vivo conditions in standard testing of spinal implants. Research design and methods We conducted an in vitro study to identify an industrial lubricant with characteristics that are most similar to those of biologically lubricating fat, blood, and tissue fluids. The use of such a material could standardize the results of in vitro mechanical tests for better clinical applications. Results Our study has shown that the lubricity of physiological saline was well below that of human soft tissues and tissue fluids, and among the motor oils, Castrol GTX3 provided a testing environment similar to that of a living organism. Conclusions With the intention of standardizing and preventing a biological hazard, we have developed a reproducible mechanical testing proposal based on our experiments, which, in addition, would allow us to avoid many misunderstandings and contingencies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available