4.5 Article

A Deconvolution Method for the Mapping of Residual Stresses by X-Ray Diffraction

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS
Volume 62, Issue 8, Pages 1349-1362

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-022-00839-5

Keywords

X-ray diffraction; Residual stresses; Aluminum alloys; Severe plastic deformation; Deconvolution

Funding

  1. Carnot Institut Arts
  2. UNAM-DGAPA-PASPA program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops a reconstruction method to map heterogeneous residual stresses from X-ray diffraction averaged measurements. The method is based on the deconvolution of average XRD measurements and involves a fine measurement grid and the use of two collimators to obtain accurate local stress field values.
Background Inherent averaging effects in X-ray diffraction measurement of residual stresses, related to the finite size of the irradiated area, lead to inaccurate measurements in the presence of high surface stress gradients. Objective This paper develops a reconstruction method which allows the mapping of heterogeneous residual stresses from X-ray diffraction averaged measurements. Methods The stress reconstruction is based on a deconvolution of the average XRD measurements. The combination of a fine measurement grid and the use of two collimators lead to an overdetermined linear system on the average stress measured experimentally whose inversion provides the values of the local stress field. Results First, the method is successfully assessed in a reference problem solved by FEM in which the local distribution and average datasets are known. Then, it is applied to the reconstruction of residual stress mapping from experimental XRD measurements of a specimen processed by repetitive corrugation and straightening. The reconstructed field is in agreement with numerical (local) results of the process. Conclusion The method developed in this work permits the reconstruction of accurate distributions of heterogeneous near-surface residual-stresses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available