4.5 Article

Dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT evaluation of dural arteriovenous fistula in patients with pulsatile tinnitus as an initial symptom

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110137

Keywords

Dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT; Dural arteriovenous fistula; Pulsatile tinnitus

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61527807, 61931013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT (DP-CECT) for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) in patients with pulsatile tinnitus (PT), compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The results showed that DP-CECT had high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DAVF in PT patients.
Purpose: Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) can cause pulsatile tinnitus (PT). The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT (DP-CECT) for DAVF in PT patients compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Method: From February 2015 to April 2021, PT patients undergoing routine DSA examination were prospectively analyzed. Patients with and without DAVF diagnosed by DSA were included. In DP-CECT, the radiological signs related to DAVF were assessed as follows: asymmetric external carotid artery (ECA) branches, asymmetric enhancement of intracranial or extracranial veins, asymmetric venous collaterals in extracranial space, and shaggy tentorium or venous sinus on CTA; asymmetric enhancement of intracranial or extracranial veins on CTV; numerous transcalvarial channels and asymmetric size of foramen spinosum on high-resolution CT (HRCT). Results: 253 PT patients receiving DSA were enrolled, and these patients had previously been screened by DP-CECT. Forty-six patients were diagnosed as DAVF by DSA. Therefore, the prevalence of DAVF was 18% (46/253) in patients with PT as the initial symptom. The sensitivity and specificity of DP-CECT for diagnosis of DAVF were 96% and 100%. The sensitivity of individual CTA signs ranged from 65% to 93%, and specificities ranged from 83% to 100%. The sensitivity of CTV sign was 80%, and specificity was 100%. The sensitivity of individual HRCT signs ranged from 48 to 52% and specificities from 61 to 100%. Conclusions: DAVF is not rare in patients with PT as the initial symptom. DP-CECT can be used for screening DAVF in patients with PT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available