4.5 Article

Assessment of psychosocial difficulties by genetic clinicians and distress in women at high risk of breast cancer: a prospective study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 1067-1075

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01096-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [634935]
  2. France, at Institut Curie [INCa-DGOS-Inserm_12554]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined how often genetic clinicians correctly identify psychosocial difficulties in women at high breast cancer risk and found that clinicians generally underestimated these difficulties. Counselees' distress levels remained stable throughout the counseling process, regardless of the accuracy of clinicians' assessments and the genetic test result disclosure. Psychological referral was more frequently needed for difficulties in the emotions domain.
We examined how often genetic clinicians correctly identify psychosocial difficulties in women at high breast cancer risk and explored effects of this assessment and the genetic test result on counselees' distress. A prospective observational study of counselee-clinician dyads was performed in three French, German and Spanish genetic clinics, involving 709 counselees (participation rate, 83.4%) and 31 clinicians (participation rate, 100%). Counselee-clinician agreement in perceived psychosocial difficulties was measured after the pre-test genetic consultation. Multivariate mixed linear models accounting for clinicians were tested. Predicted distress levels were assessed after the pre- (T1) and post-test result disclosure consultations (T2). Depending on the difficulty domain, clinicians adequately assessed the presence or absence of difficulties in 51% (familial issues) to 59% (emotions) of counselees. When counselees' and clinicians' perceptions disagreed, difficulties were generally underestimated by clinicians. Counselees' distress levels remained stable from T1 to T2, irrespective of clinicians' appraisal adequacy, and the genetic test result disclosure. Psychological referral need were found in 20-42% of counselees, more frequently observed for difficulties in the emotions domain. Our findings suggest that the genetic test result is a suboptimal indicator for psychological referral. Instead, clinicians should focus on emotions expressed by counselees to appraise their needs for psychological support.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available