4.4 Article

Patient-reported participation in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery cancer care: A pilot intervention study with patient-owned fast-track protocols

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13570

Keywords

fast-track surgery; hepatopancreatobiliary cancer surgery; information; patient participation; recovery; surgical care

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of using patient-owned fast-track protocols on patient participation and information in hepatopancreatobiliary cancer surgery. The results suggest that the use of PFTP may lead to improvements for the patient group.
Objective Fast-track concepts have been implemented in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery cancer care to improve postoperative recovery. For optimal postoperative care, patient participation is also required. The aim was to investigate and analyse whether an intervention with patient-owned fast-track protocols (PFTPs) may lead to increased patient participation and improve information for patients who underwent surgery for hepatopancreatobiliary cancer. Methods A quantitative comparative design with a control and intervention group was used. The participants in the intervention group followed a PFTP during their admission. After discharge, the patients answered a questionnaire regarding patient participation. Data analyses were performed with descriptive statistics and ANCOVA. Results The results are based on a total of 222 completed questionnaires: 116 in the control group and 106 in the intervention group. It is uncertain whether the PFTP increased patient participation and information, but its use may indicate an improvement for the patient group. Conclusion A successful implementation strategy for the use of PFTP, with daily reconciliations, could be part of the work required to improve overall satisfaction with patient participation. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04061902

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available