4.4 Article

A prospective evaluation of the fourth national Be Clear on Cancer 'Blood in Pee' campaign in England

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13606

Keywords

awareness; early diagnosis; haematuria; kidney neoplasms; public health; urinary bladder neoplasms

Funding

  1. Public Health England
  2. National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula
  3. Cancer Research UK [C8640/Q37A23385]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fourth Be Clear on Cancer (BCoC) 'Blood in Pee' (BiP) campaign appears to have been effective in increasing bladder cancer symptom awareness and GP attendances, although long-term impacts are unclear.
Objective To assess the impact of the fourth Be Clear on Cancer (BCoC) 'Blood in Pee' (BiP) campaign (July to September 2018) on bladder and kidney cancer symptom awareness and outcomes in England. Methods In this uncontrolled before and after study, symptom awareness and reported barriers to GP attendance were assessed using panel and one-to-one interviews. The Health Improvement Network (THIN), National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) and NHS Cancer Waiting Times (CWT) data were analysed to assess the impact on GP attendances, urgent cancer referrals, cancer diagnoses and 1-year survival. Analyses used Poisson, negative binomial and Cox regression. Results Symptom awareness and intention to consult a GP after one episode of haematuria increased following the campaign. GP attendance with haematuria (rate ratio (RR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.28) and urgent cancer referrals (RR 1.18 95% CI: 1.08-1.28) increased following the campaign. Early-stage diagnoses increased for bladder cancer (difference in percentage 2.8%, 95% CI: -0.2%-5.8%), but not for kidney cancer (difference -0.6%, 95% CI: -3.2%-2.1%). Conclusions The fourth BCoC BiP campaign appears to have been effective in increasing bladder cancer symptom awareness and GP attendances, although long-term impacts are unclear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available