4.5 Article

The impact of school-based screening on service use in adolescents at risk for mental health problems and risk-behaviour

Journal

EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 1745-1754

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-022-01990-z

Keywords

Adolescents; Mental health problems; Risk behaviours; School-based screening; Service use

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early detection and intervention can help prevent mental disorders and risk behaviors among adolescents, but many of them do not seek help. School-based screenings are a promising approach to identify at-risk adolescents and encourage help-seeking behavior. However, this study found that the intervention called ProfScreen did not significantly improve the use of mental health services or reduce the at-risk state among participants compared to the control group.
Early detection and intervention can counteract mental disorders and risk behaviours among adolescents. However, help-seeking rates are low. School-based screenings are a promising tool to detect adolescents at risk for mental problems and to improve help-seeking behaviour. We assessed associations between the intervention Screening by Professionals (ProfScreen) and the use of mental health services and at-risk state at 12 month follow-up compared to a control group. School students (aged 15 +/- 0.9 years) from 11 European countries participating in the Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe (SEYLE) study completed a self-report questionnaire on mental health problems and risk behaviours. ProfScreen students considered at-risk for mental illness or risk behaviour based on the screening were invited for a clinical interview with a mental health professional and, if necessary, referred for subsequent treatment. At follow-up, students completed another self-report, additionally reporting on service use. Of the total sample (N=4,172), 61.9% were considered at-risk. 40.7% of the ProfScreen at-risk participants invited for the clinical interview attended the interview, and 10.1% of subsequently referred ProfScreen participants engaged in professional treatment. There were no differences between the ProfScreen and control group regarding follow-up service use and at-risk state. Attending the ProfScreen interview was positively associated with follow-up service use (OR= 1.783, 95% CI= 1.038-3.064), but had no effect on follow-up at-risk state. Service use rates of professional care as well as of the ProfScreen intervention itself were low. Future school-based interventions targeting help-seeking need to address barriers to intervention adherence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available