4.5 Review

Electromyography of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscles: a consensus guideline

Journal

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
Volume 279, Issue 8, Pages 3785-3793

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07357-z

Keywords

Posterior cricoarytenoid muscle; Laryngeal electromyography; Guideline; Review; Aberrant reinnervation

Funding

  1. MED-EL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to provide an update and extension to the existing guidelines on laryngeal electromyography (EMG), specifically focusing on the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle (PCA) EMG. Detailed instructions on how to perform and interpret PCA EMG were provided, and further research on normal values and unusual activation patterns is recommended.
Purpose Since the introduction of transcutaneous-transcricoidal needle approaches, electromyography (EMG) of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle (PCA) became easier to perform and teach. Among the Neurolaryngology working group of the European Laryngological Society, several centers have adopted PCA EMG as part of their routine EMG workup in vocal fold immobility collectively gathering long-term experience. The purpose is to give an update and an extension to already existing guidelines on laryngeal EMG with specific regard to PCA EMG. Methods Consensus of all co-authors is based on continuous exchange of ideas and on joint laryngeal EMG workshop experiences over at least 7 years. A Delphi method of consensus development was used, i.e., the manuscript was circulated among the co-authors until full agreement was achieved. Results Step-by-step instructions on how to perform and interpret PCA EMG are provided. Conclusions Further research should include the establishment of normal values for PCA and thyroarytenoid muscle (TA) EMG as well as studies on the nature of some unusual activation pattern commonly seen in chronically lesioned PCA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available