Journal
EUROPACE
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 1608-1616Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac046
Keywords
S-ICD; Inappropriate shock; Air entrapment; Oversensing; Systematic review
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This systematic review analyzed the phenomenon of air entrapment (AE) as a potential cause of early inappropriate shocks (ISs) following subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. The study included 54 patients with AE as a potential cause of S-ICD malfunction, with an overall incidence of 1.2%. Radiologic diagnosis of AE was confirmed in 28% of the entire study cohort. The management approach of non-invasive management, primarily device reprogramming, appeared to be effective in most patients.
Aims Air entrapment (AE) has been reported as a potential cause of early inappropriate shocks (ISs) following subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation, but a cause-effect relationship is not always evident. This systematic review aims to analyse this phenomenon concerning implantation techniques, electrogram (EGM) features, radiologic findings, and patient management. Methods and results A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases following the PRISMA guidelines to obtain all available literature data since 2010 on S-ICD malfunctions possibly due to AE. The final analysis included 54 patients with AE as a potential cause of S-ICD malfunction. Overall, the aggregate incidence of this condition was 1.2%. Of ICD malfunctions possibly due to AE, 93% were ISs, and 95% were recorded within the first week following implantation. Radiologic diagnosis of AE was confirmed in 28% of the entire study cohort and in 68% of patients in whom this diagnostic examination was reported. At the time of device malfunction, EGMs showed artefacts, baseline drift, and QRS voltage reduction in 95, 76, and 67% of episodes, respectively. Management included ICD reprogramming or testing, no action (observation), and invasive implant revision in 57, 33, and 10% of patients, respectively. No recurrences occurred during follow-up, irrespective of management performed. Conclusions Device malfunction possibly due to AE may occur in similar to 1% of S-ICD recipients. Diagnosis is strongly suggested by early occurrence, characteristic EGM features, and radiologic findings. Non-invasive management, principally device reprogramming, appears to be effective in most patients.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available