4.1 Article

The limits of olfactory perception in black vultures: a field experiment

Journal

ETHOLOGY ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 340-347

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2022.2062617

Keywords

foraging; landfills; olfaction; scavenging; sensotry ecology; turkey vulture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that black vultures have a developed sense of smell and use it as their most relevant sense when searching for food in plastic bags and piles of waste.
New World vultures have been considerably studied regarding their sense of smell. Cathartes species present a remarkable development of their olfactory apparatus, and experiments conducted with the turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) demonstrated that they can locate carrion exclusively by smell at considerable distances. Black vultures (Coragyps atratus), because of their less developed olfactory apparatus, have been compared with the turkey vulture as a phylogenetically related species lacking the sense of smell. However, little evidence from behavioural studies supports the lack of olfaction of black vultures. We conducted a field experiment where we presented urban black vultures a binary choice of decaying fish and sand (serving as control) inside plastic bags. Birds chose the fish bait in 81% of the times they approached the plastic bags. The probability of reaction decreased significantly with the distance between the birds and the fish bait, being virtually null at 40-50 m away. Furthermore, birds clearly reacted more when the fish presented higher decaying time (7 compared to 2 days). These results show that olfaction is not only used by black vultures but is probably the most relevant sense when they search for food hidden in plastic bags and in piles of unsorted waste, which is the most common foraging environment for this species in urban areas where they are very abundant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available