4.5 Article

Antiseizure medication treatment pathways for US Medicare beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy

Journal

EPILEPSIA
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages 1571-1579

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17226

Keywords

antiseizure medications; epilepsy; medication pathways

Funding

  1. Susan S Spencer Clinical Research Training Scholarship
  2. Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research J Award [UL1TR002240]
  3. NINDS [R01 NS104076]
  4. National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities [R01 MD008879]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to investigate the treatment pathways and medication costs for newly treated epilepsy patients covered by Medicare. The results show that monotherapy is the most common treatment approach, while the use of levetiracetam accounts for a significant portion of medication costs. The choice of treatment pathways varies based on factors such as mood disorders, age, and prescribing physician.
Objective This study was undertaken to characterize antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment pathways in Medicare beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims. Medicare is the United States' federal health insurance program for people aged 65 years and older plus younger people with disabilities or end-stage renal disease. We included beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases codes for epilepsy/convulsions 2014-2017, no ASM in the previous 2 years). We displayed the sequence of ASM fills using sunburst plots overall, then stratified by mood disorder, age, and neurologist prescriber. We tabulated drug costs for each pathway. Results We included 21 458 beneficiaries. Levetiracetam comprised the greatest number of pill days (56%), followed by gabapentin (11%) and valproate (8%). There were 22 288 unique treatment pathways. The most common pathways were levetiracetam monotherapy (43%), gabapentin monotherapy (10%), and valproate monotherapy (5%). Gabapentin was the most common second- and third-line ASM. Whereas only 2% of pathways involved first-line lacosamide, those pathways accounted for 19% of cost. Gabapentin and valproate use was increased and levetiracetam use was decreased in beneficiaries with mood disorders compared to beneficiaries without mood disorders. Levetiracetam use was increased and gabapentin, valproate, lamotrigine, and topiramate use was decreased in beneficiaries aged >65 years compared with those aged 65 years or less. Lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and lacosamide use was increased and gabapentin use was decreased in beneficiaries whose initial prescriber was a neurologist compared to those whose prescriber was not a neurologist. Significance Levetiracetam monotherapy was the most common pathway, although substantial heterogeneity existed. Lacosamide accounted for a small percentage of ASMs but a disproportionately large share of cost. Neurologists were more likely to prescribe lamotrigine compared with nonneurologists, and lamotrigine was prescribed far less frequently than may be endorsed by guidelines. Future work may explore patient- and physician-driven factors underlying ASM choices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available