4.7 Article

Vanadium(IV) oxide affects embryonic development in mice

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 1587-1596

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/tox.23508

Keywords

abnormalities in mice offspring; embryo and fetotoxicity; maternal toxicity; pregnant mice; reduced ossification of the bones; vanadium(IV)

Funding

  1. Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Project [PAPIIT IN229220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that administration of V2O4 to pregnant mice during the organogenesis period resulted in maternal and embryo-fetal toxicity, as well as external abnormalities in the offspring. The fetuses showed reduced ossification of cranial bones, corresponding to head injuries observed in the external assessment.
Vanadium(V) and vanadium(IV) are the predominant redox forms present in the environment, and epidemiological studies have reported that prenatal vanadium exposure is associated with restricted fetal growth and adverse birth outcomes. However, data about the toxic effects of vanadium(IV) oxide (V2O4) on the development of mammals are still limited. Therefore, in this work, 4.7, 9.4, or 18.7 mg/kg body weight/injection/day V2O4 was administered through an intraperitoneal (ip) injection to pregnant mice from gestational days 6 to 16. The results showed that V2O4 produced maternal and embryo-fetal toxicity and external abnormalities in the offspring, such as malrotated and malpositioned hind limbs, hematomas and head injuries. Moreover, the skeletons of the fetuses presented reduced ossification of the cranial bones, including the frontal and parietal bones, corresponding to head injuries observed in the external assessment of the fetuses. These results demonstrate that administration of V2O4 to pregnant females in the organogenesis period adversely affects embryonic development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available