4.7 Article

How does biased technological progress affect haze pollution? Evidence from APEC economies

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 36, Pages 54543-54560

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19568-2

Keywords

Haze pollution; Biased technological progress; Neutral technological progress; Marginal rate of substitution; Panel quantile model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71673134, 72074111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of biased technological progress on reducing PM2.5 by introducing renewable energy into a production function. The findings indicate that input biased technological progress exacerbates haze pollution, while output biased technological progress significantly reduces it in high-income economies and increases it in low-income economies. Increasing renewable energy consumption and reducing energy intensity are effective ways to mitigate haze pollution caused by input and output biased technological progress, respectively.
Biased technological progress is the act of energy conservation and emission reduction by changing the marginal rate of substitution. In this study, we introduced renewable energy into a production function, and proposed a method of identifying biased characteristics of technological progress, based on marginal productivity theory. A panel dataset for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) economies from 2000 to 2017 was analyzed to explore the effect of biased technological progress in reducing particulate matter (PM2.5). We found that input biased technological progress tended to use more non-renewable energy. Input biased technological progress aggravated haze pollution; however, this effect decreased as the PM2.5 concentration increased. Output biased technological progress significantly reduced haze pollution in high-income economies, but increased it in low-income economies. The effect of neutral technological progress on haze pollution was the opposite of the effect from output biased technological progress. We also found that increasing renewable energy consumption and reducing energy intensity were separate effective paths for input and output biased technological progress, respectively, to mitigate haze pollution. For neutral technological progress, improving total factor productivity was an important way to mitigate haze pollution. Finally, several policy recommendations are proposed to mitigate haze pollution in APEC economies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available